So it looks like I’m in for another learning experience, or two, with this week’s challenges. For the photography challenge, I have been tasked to take high key photographs. High Key? I wasn’t quite sure what that was, so I googled, and it appears that there are quite a few differences in opinion as to what classifies as high key photography. The general consensus is that a high key photography should contain a lot of white, no/very few shadows, and very lightened mid-tones. Now, when actually viewing photographs, it seems that people have different opinions. After doing some research, the black and white images that I came across seemed to turn out more successful, while the color images were hard to define as “high key” in my opinion, particularly when they contained highly saturated colors. So I think I’m going to go for the black and white look (yay!).
The subject matter is going to be interesting, however. Many of the words I found that were used to describe high key photography were “happy”, “bright”, “cheery”, and “light and fluffy”. Ick — I’m not one for doing happy, lovey-dovey, all is well with the world type photographs. I know, I just posted some borderline “fluffy” pictures of flowers, but that’s different! I find beauty in the world, as well as in a lot of things that others would not find beautiful, so when capturing things like flowers and nature, that’s what I’m looking at, not their “fluff” value.
The second part of this challenge, the business side, is another bonus photography challenge this week (double yay). The business objective is to shoot the opposite. Now, that’s pretty open for interpretation, but it’s intended to be understood as to shoot the opposite of what you normally do. In evaluating what I usually shoot, I think I have what my “opposite” should be. I’m often doing landscapes, nature photography, and beach photography, and when working on projects, I often work with still life set ups and (usually bribed) models. My opposite would be street photography. It’s something that I’ve always wanted to get in to, have always been intimidated by, and have always adored when viewing the works of others. In just going through the assignments of my photography classes, I was always in awe of how these non-art-marjor, amateur photographers, would capture wonderful, candid images in their street photography. Not that I’m looking down on their skill in saying that, I’m actually giving them props — they were brand new in a medium I have worked with for years, and seemed to have broken through the barrier that the idea street photography has built for me. As I worked through my classes and became more familiar with the works of other artist, I became even more captivated with the idea of capturing striking photos from everyday interactions. I would have to say that my favorite would be Garry Winogrand, which was only amplified after I saw an exhibit of his at the National Gallery. I’m a little bittered of the idea of street photography after seeing his photographs, wishing that people still dressed the way they did in the 50’s and 60’s. I feel that there is a level of class in that era which he captured in his images, and nothing close to that could be captured again. If you haven’t seen his work, you should, like right now — it’s pretty great. Anyways, as I ramble on, that’s going to be my focus for the weekend, hopefully. With another bout of winter weather coming around, I may have a better chance at catching some outdoor high key photographs than street photography. Wish me luck!
Oh, and here’s a couple of photographs which I have taken in the past that bordered high key, and with my edits, I think are approaching that technique. Not quite sure if I’ve got it, but hopefully with some intentional lighting and camera settings, I’ll catch the light just right.